Sales eval scoreboard

SLAtech Sales: 87/100

Reproducible 200-question Sales-specific eval harness. +15-point lift vs generic SLAtech-Business (72/100). Driven by MEDDIC/BANT qualification depth, CRM-sync hygiene, and objection-handling library. Pairs with umbrella eval scoreboard, Sales glossary and Sales FAQ.

Score breakdown by category

CategorySales-tunedGenericLift
MEDDIC / BANT qualification depth

Metrics, Economic-buyer, Decision-criteria/process, Identify-pain, Champion — all 6 axes scored per lead. Generic chatbots collect name + email only.

91 65 +26
CRM-sync hygiene

Salesforce / HubSpot / Pipedrive native field mapping, dedup against existing contact records, lead-source attribution. Generic chatbots fire webhooks blindly.

90 73 +17
Objection-handling library

200+ scripted responses tagged by objection type (price, timing, authority, need). Generic chatbots improvise — often agreeing with the prospect's objection.

88 70 +18
Meeting-booking automation

Calendly / Chili Piper integration with round-robin routing by territory + AE seniority. Generic chatbots send а raw scheduling link with no routing logic.

85 79 +6
Pricing-disclosure discipline

List-price quoting with discount-trigger escalation to human AE for enterprise tiers. Generic chatbots either over-disclose or under-quote.

83 76 +7

Competitor comparison

SLAtech Sales

87/100

MEDDIC-native, CRM-sync hygiene, objection library default-on

Drift (incumbent)

82/100

Strong meeting-booking but weaker MEDDIC depth, US-locale defaults, no Hebrew RTL

Qualified (PMM-tuned)

84/100

Visitor-intent tracking strong, but enterprise CRM-sync requires implementation-consultant

Tidio Lyro (generic SMB)

67/100

No MEDDIC framework, no CRM-sync hygiene, conversation cap on lower tiers

Continue the buyer evaluation

The per-vertical eval score is one input. Three more self-serve tools complete the picture without a sales call:

Umbrella eval scoreboard →All 9 verticals side-by-side TCO calculator →Annual savings + payback math Vendor compare-tool →Filter 16 vendors on 6 axes Vendor checklist →30 procurement due-diligence questions

Reproduce the eval against your own tenant

Eval methodology is open-source. 200 sealed Sales-specific questions with LLM-as-Judge scoring on factuality, hallucination and confidence axes.